Subsidizing The Sun -
Passive Energy on
Pumped Money
Passive Energy on Pumped Money

People who work with passive systems pride
themselves on their skills in arranging buildings and
equipment so that they operate by themselves. They
detest fans and pumps for they coerce materials which
are happy to do the job in pure cooperation if you will
only let them. It is strange to think there could be any
argument in such a group over how to finance their
work. Tax money must always be pumped while private
money flows by itself in voluntary exchanges.
Good passive design is hard work. It is also hard work
to get private money to flow one’s way for passive
products or research.
I don’t think that passive design needs one penny of tax
money for support. The massive amounts of money (for
the field) the DOE poured into passive design in the
late ‘70s and early ‘80s served only to corrupt an
enjoyable world. Volunteer organizations became tax
supported; meetings which had been fun became boring.
A world of lively volunteers changed to a world of
government paid stooges.

Spin Off or Spin In

The newspapers and magazines are filled with stories
about our modern tax supported research centers such
as Los Alamos and Sandia Labs. What they are doing is
too profound for the layman to understand, but he
should be grateful for the “spin offs” that society
enjoys. In some fields there may be truth to this, but is
has not been true with passive solar work. I have seen
more “spin in” than spin off.
For instance, in 1974 I showed Doug Balcomb, Jim
Hedstrom and Stan Moore from Los Alamos Scientific
Labs my drum-wall house with moveable insulating and
reflecting doors and Paul Davis’ air loop rock storage
house. Little did we know that years later similar
studies with big budgets would become “pioneering
science.” It’s perfectly all right with me if fools wish to
hang medals on each other and pretend false
accomplishments as long as I’m not paying for it. In the
case of tax supported research the men bestowing
honors on one another are not fools, even though the
honors are false. Each medal and dignified citation is
like a ticket to a good spot for slurping tax money in
years to come.

Rolling

If your dog comes upon a dead animal on a walk he can’
t resist rolling in it. Evidently the temptation to disguise
himself with another scent is irresistible. The well paid
DOE scientific groups like to roll in any authentic grass
roots solar energy organizations. If the grass roots
organization isn’t dead before they begin rolling in it, it
soon will be. You can spot the onset when usually well
tailored government scientists and engineers arrive in
peculiar looking “casual clothes” for a grass roots
meeting.

Get on the Team

If the tax supported program has a large enough budget
most critics can be bought off by offering them
consulting jobs or passing a grant their way. People
who do not accept such consulting jobs are not part of
the team and can expect thereafter to be punished by
having all mention of their work omitted by the
subsidized scientists. For instance, I refused to be a
paid consultant on LASL projects and so our work on
passive test cells, which was the first the LASL group
ever saw, was omitted from their “extensive survey” of
all such work in the U.S.A. and Canada.
Our country is heavily in debt. We make payroll at our
government research labs by borrowing money from the
Japanese and the Europeans. Something has gone
drastically wrong. It has to do with economic design
and with a system that is unable to stop even though it
is destroying itself. It is a challenging problem, one that
should interest every passive designer who ever had the
thrill of discovering how to rearrange a few parts and
suddenly have reliable comfort and security where
before there was discomfort and debt.
Living things are well designed, and so are market
economies. Our bodies protect themselves by having
injured spots hurt, just as market economies protect
themselves by having useless projects go broke. If you
get a splinter in your finger your body hurts and
becomes infected near the splinter. Our government
planned economy is exactly the opposite. When our
country is injured by another wasteful tax supported
research project the pain and infection don’t occur near
the project (three new jobs at the lab!) but instead on
the opposite side of the country. Every new tax
supported program adds to the sickness of the whole,
but feels good to the injured spot. The sicker the
economy becomes under the arrangement of subsidies,
the more badly each part needs to get relief by a new
injury.
Yes, I know this is an oversimplification since some tax
supported programs can be beneficial. But there is no
way to separate the good from the bad—its needless
confusion of the mistaken, the liars and the don’t cares.

Steve Baer
NEXT - Solar Subsidies
What Do They Mean?